Inside NWO - Quareness Series 162nd "Lecture".
Life inside the New World Order...maybe we're already partly there?
Over this past two years we have seen the open ascendency of what is in effect a global fascism with cold technocratic features orchestrated by an elite cabal of greedy oligarchs and remorseless bureaucrats taking instruction from shadowy cliques of science advisors in seeking to govern every aspect of our daily lives. We have been told where we are allowed to travel, if we are allowed to work, what we can buy, whether our children can attend school, and even who we are allowed to meet. The level of control has been so thorough as to extend to the mandating of mask wearing and what experimental injections we are pressured to receive in order to "win back our freedoms" and return to normal life. And it has been repeatedly stressed by a global (not just national) regime that all of this is necessary both for our own ongoing safety and that of the collective.
Whatever reservations one may have with the detail of this description, it has been very clear that nearly every government on the planet has used the pandemic to tighten its grip on power and its domestic situation and to quell any potential civil or political opposition. Indeed some have gone so far as to impose a semi-permanent state of emergency. Historically we have seen this level of rapid societal and economic reorganisation (including the shuttering of institutions and services and suspension of rights) only in preparation for war. And we are now left with the uneasy feeling that we may be forced to remain permanently prepared for an ongoing global upheaval.
Are we being primed for a new cold war and a return to bipolarism? Like the previous version, such could be a perpetual affair characterised by long-term, low-intensity (external and internal) conflict carefully designed to hem in populations on both sides of a new global paradigm. With the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991 the western liberal and free-market model had prevailed and the then victorious ex-bipolarists ushered in an era led by a neoconservative and neoliberal unipolar domination of various global regions. However, as this unipolar ascendency threatens to give way to a multipolar replacement, it's becoming clearer that elites might sometimes prefer a bipolar world order which is easier to physically control and administer through the management of intellectual and political life.
One way to maintain a bipolar world order, and not allow it to develop into an uncontrollable, unpredictable multipolar one, is to hijack those countries within contested zones...in effect weakening and even destroying emerging economies and markets. The objective here would be to cripple them through economic sanctions or ‘green’ climate change regulations thereby preventing their development towards first world nation status. Economically weakening a country allows for the creation of a perpetual state of dependency on aid and resource extraction by foreign powers, leading to continuous political instability and a constant brain drain of those who would usually form the vanguard of any future populist movement. This has been the neocolonial playbook formula for managing target nations for much of the post-WW2 epoch. And in any new bipolar world order, many geopolitical routes and clusters might eventually become part of a "disputed zone", not unlike that depicted on George Orwell's geopolitical map in his 1984 dystopian novel.
Declaring perpetual war can seem an effective way to retain a firm grip on order at home and along the periphery of the contested zone. Over the last half century we have seen China grow into an economic giant without any real hindrance so long as its gains are confined to Asian wealth creation and prosperity without threatening the global political and cultural stronghold of the Anglo-American control mesh of Five Eyes intelligence and NATO military alliances. But as soon as such gains by any "enemy block" look like being transformed into the economic dependence of the West, the geopolitical alarm is invariably tripped and counter action is triggered. The older western imperialists know that economic dependence inevitably precedes political subservience.
Whether such fears are well-founded or otherwise, the reaction can often be counterproductive and negatively impact on those countries and people caught in the middle. We see this with the instability of the Cold War period still enduring to the present day e.g. the "challenge" of Russia''s Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline project. The idea of Germany becoming dependent on Russia and developing good bilateral relations is unacceptable to the afore-mentioned Anglo-American alliance which relies on constant East-West tension to keep NATO relevant and well resourced for extending its commercial interests through Europe and into the former Soviet states. The same big power interests of course apply for the other side as we now see playing out in the "buffer state" of Ukraine.
There's also the case that any significant fossil fuel project is set to be regarded as directly threatening the Western led Great Reset and UN Agenda 2030 and subsequent planned transition to a New World Order and Fourth Industrial Revolution. Since WW2 the traditional imperialists have become post-colonial powers taking on the self-appointed custodial duties of planetary management, including climate control and environmental oversight of what they refer to as the "global commons". Having become much more green in their rhetoric and governance, we are now constantly told that it's all designed to save the planet by stopping man-made global warming aka "climate change".
The current public face of the NWO agenda, allegedly meant to save humanity from the supposed scourge of CO2, hides another rather less benign sounding goal...population management rooted in the 19th century Malthusian theory and buttressed by a radical offshoot of Darwinism...a social engineering project known as eugenics. Most of our public "overpopulation" discussions continue to be highly influenced by eugenicists operating in the shadows through lavish funding by foundations and civil society organisations, and increasingly under a banner of "public health". In this regard it may be rather more than coincidental that two leading Malthusian proponents of recent decades are William Gates (father of Bill) and Stanley Johnson (father of Boris)...an elite bloodline?
This eugenics ideology invariably pushes on to another goal of the elite technocracy movement - transhumanism. With the ongoing ascendency of Big Tech, Big Pharma and Bio-Tech industries, the global pandemic has provided an easier opportunity for transhumanist ideas and the appeal of "smart" technologies such as the Internet of Things (IOT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications. Widespread adoption of these had been a rather slow and tedious process, but the covid crisis enabled a velocity previously unattainable...and the technocrats sure took advantage. We're now looking at the likely prospect of an attempt to implement a worldwide biopower tracking regime set to spell the end of previous universally held ideals of liberty such as the individual right to bodily integrity and freedom of movement. And such could quickly see constitutional and republican government giving way to the tyrannical proclivities of an increasingly powerful ruling class posing as legitimate custodians of both the common good and the collective will. Consider what the authorities have done in practice from the beginning of the covid panic..."manufacturing consent" through relentless application of weaponised propaganda and behavioural psychology. What we could have here is the forging of a new kind of insidious world order now made possible via the rapid advances in digital technology, data sharing, satellite and surveillance networks.
We're set to hear more and more that global crises require global responses. A new wannabe global governance regime is starting to push hard for the undermining of local and national sovereignty citing the need for closure of borders, normalisation and standardisation of testing for disease, digital IDs and even collapsing of the real economy. With any uniform technocracy there'd be less and less need for democratic forms of government (other than for show) with the real power centralised in a technocratic elite. We can catch a glimpse of such a dystopian future in the European Union experiment where "one size fits all" legislation mostly originates with the unelected heads of an unelected civil service (EU Commission) to be rubber stamped later by the elected MEPs of parliament. Under this system change, rather than being a grassroots or bottom-up political effort, is mostly a top-down exercise micro-managed by "experts"...by definition, a functioning technocracy.
Government policies such as lockdowns now appear to have accelerated the new "green economy", not on its own merits so much as by wrecking much of the existing economy and squeezing out what are increasingly deemed to be nonessential businesses and services...indeed anything that falls foul of the post-pandemic New Normal. Of course the inevitable inflationary cycles driven by printing money for corporate bailouts and to pay the burgeoning ranks of underemployed will mostly negatively impact on the lower and middle classes robbing them of their savings and purchasing power. The elite and mobile globalist class, on the other hand, have already had record gains...especially for those in the favoured digital and "essential" industries. And it is this cohort which will have the liquidity and capital to buy up the remaining assets tied to the old economy and invest in the ground level of the new green era. With the New Normal helping to solidify their position and wipe out prospective competitors for some time, it's these global oligarchs and their bankster backers who are set to dominate this New World Order...just like the Rockefellers, Morgans and Carnegies of the old order.
And right on cue the technocrats of the World Economic Forum are now openly calling for a "fair" Great Reset, to run under a banner of "stakeholder capitalism" and in the woke spirit of "equity" and utopian-sounding global citizenship. However, the harsh reality is that at the top of this new "sustainable" pyramid we are most likely to have a hardened fascist layer dominated by the biggest transnational corporations and government bureaucracies imposing a collectivist system upon the vast majority beneath. As the proponents of the Great Reset are already saying - "in the future you will rent everything and you will own nothing and be happy"...Huxley's Brave New World is born.
Rather than due to flamboyant totalitarian leaders, the more effective mechanism of control to this end is to be found in people's need to exhibit conformity as they harmonise with the "authoritarian conscience". As the late German-born social psychologist Erich Fromm (1900-1980) once pointed out...the authoritarian conscience in its extreme form sees morality as determined by conformism..."Virtue is to be adjusted and to be like the rest. Vice, to be different." When people who are traumatised through internalising the virtue of conformity go against the group, this brings feelings of guilt which exercise a powerful hold on them. "Conscience is a more effective regulator of conduct than fear of external authorities; for, while one can run away from the latter, one cannot escape from oneself nor, therefore from the internalised authority which has become part of oneself.” - Erich Fromm again. Here we can see the power of self-policing behaviour...with the denial of individual rights and liberties, the individual is subsumed by the hive.
Given the apparent widespread growing urge to enforce conformity on all sides, we may wonder if the stage is now being set for a series of new "popular" wars...in addition to the existing ongoing "war on terror". With the recent assaults on our human rights and freedoms (under cover of a biological war against a virus), maybe the prospects for a new global war on bio-terror with an international bioweapons "arms race" is not so surprising. And along with such a biowar we might see a new global cyberwar (already in train?) with the potential for endless false flag instances causing untold chaos and unnecessarily stoking up even more geopolitical tension and animosity between the great powers. Another alarming aspect in prospect is discernible due to the presence today of low yield "tactical nukes" which could spark a number of scenarios with unforseen reactions and outcomes. At the very least such circumstances could see the wholesale locking down of countries and regions as "exclusion zones" become quite routine.
Our elites have not been "behind the door" in broadcasting these "manufactured" dangers. Indeed they are well practiced in playing the "great chess game" to decide who holds and wields power well enough to frighten opponents whilst still achieving their strategic objectives. Whether the rest of us will prevail over these architects of chaos most likely now depends on a sufficient number of individuals remaining fully in touch with our inherent humanity...as well as how soon we'll get around to exposing the malice behind those transhumanist totalitarian delusions (to put it in relatively polite language).
Sean.
Dean of Quareness.
March, 2022.