Some Questions - Quareness Series 193rd "Lecture".
Could it be that COVID-19 disease was a causal label applied to many (most?) deaths which occurred where a specific sequence was identified using a range of rather dubious tests? (Indeed maybe there were some such deaths where it was just assumed to be the cause in the absence of any tests at all).
It's been noticeable that in some areas / communities which essentially ignored the "hysteria" generated, there was no pandemic. Does this indicate that the "official" pandemic was really one of fear and hysteria?
Is it plausible to believe that the "lethal" SARS-CoV-2 virus had spread to several continents and was almost totally unnoticed as a "major threat" prior to the globalised emergency response?
What triggered it to suddenly become dangerous "everywhere"...was that trigger more behavioral than biological?
Has the targetting of a measurable bottom-line of profit corrupted some of our cultures to the extent of fostering a hive-mind without ethics in purely following corporate rules and hierarchy?
Has a war mentality (to fight the virus) stringently promoted by elites been effectively forced on us all to either play along or resist (leaving no room for neutrals)?
When so many played along could they have been willing participants through complying with their own micro environment rules without much thinking?
Instead of a grand plan maybe all it needed was more affirmation of mindsets and roles to make sure no parts in the system would start thinking as individuals and disrupt the machine?
Could it be that many people, even if with good intent, participated in undermining cohesive societies and healthy humanity through behaving like innocent bystanders and relying far too much on "experts"?
Comment:
Part of coming to terms with what has happened over the past 3 years will have to involve widespread acceptance of the intangible concept of human weakness in all of us. Such will help to counter our widespread tendency to avoid responsibility and shift blame (seemingly inherent characteristics of our current flawed political, social and cultural systems). Indeed any ethics-based social contract cannot be but messed up where the mass of people are obedient without thinking and few seem to know what true social responsibility is anymore.
Some countries enjoying the best living standards appear to have had the most compliant citizens trusting in their official systems...to the detriment of individual responsibility. History is replete with cases where the State took care of everyone and in return nobody cared much about the common good or the future. Perhaps many people have been feeling so lost in our modern world that the new gods are the institutions and whatever these dictate.
This kind of blind faith is unlikely to change anytime soon unless a critical mass of people move on to recognising the dysfunction of what has happened triggered by opportunism. We may hope for such an "awakening" to shift the global mindset to a different "new normal" where personal responsibility is rekindled by a renewed faith in something of higher value than material comfort or mass conformity. The alternative seems to point towards some sort of mass exterminating assimilation for many (as has happened before).
Censorship has for now become the main battlefront in a war of taking free communication away from us so that we remain in the dark and continue to comply. And the unfolding struggle against preventing us from exchanging ideas and thoughts may be just the latest skirmish in a long campaign yet to be won.
Please stay alert and aware mes amis.
Sean.
Dean of Quareness.
October, 2023.